Tuesday, February 08, 2011

Egypt: Revolution Pessoptimism





People camped in front of army tanks - the Egyptian, chilled version of human shields


I thought we had lost momentum, until I - and I hope millions of others - watched an exhausted, beaten, Wael Ghonim's heart-wrenching interview a couple of hours ago.

Wael was the administrator of the "We are all Khaled Said" facebook group which has been widely credited for spreading, if not originating, the call for the January 25th protest-turned-revolution.

He cried, on live television, when he was shown the photos of the people who lost their lives during the revolution. He apologized to their parents, and said. "I swear it's not our fault.. it's the fault of the people desperately clinging to power..."


It's been an exhausting two weeks. Demonstrating is a lot of effort, especially if, like the vast majority of the people there, you have a life to care about, too.

Public opinion is very difficult to read. The population has, by and large, been extremely supportive of the demonstrators camped in Tahrir and other places, up until February 1st. On that evening the President gave a pathetic address about how he had served the country for godknowshowmany years, and wanted to end his presidential term. He played on people's emotional strings and it seemed to work.

More than anything though, he has also been playing quite a dirty media game - using all government and government-controlled channels and newspapers to paint the demonstrators in the worst possible light, tarnishing their great effort and essentially claiming that they are the root of all evil.
Economic slowdown? It's the demonstrators.
Police disappeared and thugs have taken control of the streets? Gotta be the demonstrators.
Countrywide curfew? Sure, their fault too.
Food and fuel shortages? Makes total sense that the demonstrators are guilty there too.

And people are buying it. People living in the vicinity of Tahrir square have been 'arresting' and robbing protestors or anyone they suspected of being one. Many of those, by the way, have gone to Tahrir square last Wednesday 2 Feb., to joined the government's hired thugs in beating up the peaceful (and pacifist) pro-change protestors.

More frighteningly, the army, which has been deployed in the streets of Cairo to maintain peace and security since the police decided to abandon the citizens to the mercy of street thugs, is also blaming the protestors for it.

When they were first deployed, people welcomed the army with open arms. They jumped on tanks and hugged soldiers. "The People and the Army, One hand united", they chanted.

They meant it at first.

In the past few days, the slogan has sounded increasingly forcible, insincere - almost an attempt to remind the army of their vow to protect them, or perhaps sway them to their cause.

But there have been a number of incidents where People-Army tensions have flared.
An unexpected visit by a couple of generals, one of them the chief of the armed forces in Cairo, who tried to persuade people to evacuate the square, first by going into a long monologue about regional balances, then by shouting at them, and ultimately by accusing the patients at the field hospital of faking illness and injuries to "make the country look bad" (vis-a-vis the rest of the world).

The ongoing gradual return to normal life will have an unpredictable effect on the revolution's momentum.

On one hand, it is likely to quiet popular criticism towards the demonstrators, as people's anger will dampen when they start going back to work, get paid, etc.

On the other, the price that demonstrators pay to remain in the square will largely increase in relative terms - they'll be foregoing their wage, which their colleagues will not be doing.

The political machinations in the making - opposition forces discussing between themselves, with the government, various 'councils of wisemen' and other groups who claim to represent the people in Tahrir square popping up like wild mushrooms - all will have an impact on a demonstration which, it seems to me, is living day-by-day.

Which brings me to Wael Ghonim's interview. The interview effectively swept, in one TV-minute, all the clutter that had been amassing atop the core issues: human, social and economic rights. Emergency law. The brutality of a police that opens fire on demonstrators. The blood shed and the lives lost.

I'll be going to Tahrir square tomorrow with a renewed faith. This revolution is just and fair.

And we're far, far from being done.
Tomorrow will be great. And so will the day after. And the day after.


['The pessoptimist' was the title of a novel by Emile Habibi - if you haven't guessed, it's the contraction of 'pessimist' and 'optimist'.]

Thursday, February 03, 2011

Supplies needed by field hospital in Tahrir NOW متطلبات المستشفى الميداني في التحرير

(English follows. Spread away)
برجاء النشر!!

انا واقف مع دكاترة المستشفي الميداني اليوم ٣ فبراير الساعة ١١ صباحا و قالوا لي انهم محتاجين الآتي. يا ريت بسرعة قبل ما البلطجية يهجموا تاني

شاش (مهم جدا جدا)
شاش فازلين (اسمه كده ده بتاع الحروق)
بيتادين
مراهم حروق
خيط جراحة و ابر جراحة بتاعت الغرز
محلول ملحي
رباط ضاغط (كمان مهم جدا)
جوانتيات جراحية
زايلوكين محلي (بنج موضعي)
مضادات حيوية
مسكنات



I am currently at the field hospital in Tahrir square (a new makeshift clinic by the Franciscaine school across from the museum) and these are the supplies they are in dire need of. QUICK. it is now 11 am. They want the stuff. ASAP before the thugs attack again.

Medical gauze
Vaseline gauze (for burns)
Burn ointment
Surgical suture needle and thread
Saline solution
Bandages
Surgical gloves
Local zilocane (local anesthetic)
Antibiotics
Analgesics (pain killers)


Get that. Fast.



Live from tahrir square. 2 February - Eyewitness account



PLENTY (close to 200 I think) of photos are available HERE.

Until 4 pm, Tahrir square.

"We are a peaceful demonstration..." the man with the megaphone is louder than all, but it's easy to overlook his calls for calm above the madness happening in Tahrir square.

Pro-change demonstrators were attacked by an organized pro-Mubarak demo coming from the Corniche. They gathered by the TV building, they told me. One guy was unable to tell me what his own sign said. Many are wearing a laminated Egyptian flag around their neck. This is not only organized by the NDP (the president's party), it's terribly badly organized, too.

"Selmeyya, selmeyya..." ("Peaceful, peaceful...")
The pro-Mubarak ppl approached the square and pushed through the cordon of pro-change demonstrators, who chose to let them through to avoid clash. Their - our - commitment to non-violence is remarkable. Infuriating at times, but laudable.

The standoff began by the Egyptian museum. Two orderly lines facing. Attempts of provocation by the pro-Mubaraks - insults, "traitors! agents!".

They pushed. We pushed. It was non-violent until this point. At a secondary standoff, a pro-Mubarak person screams "I spit on you and on your mothers". A pro-change demonstrator was going to respond, but another guy grabs him -- "don't. Chant slogans instead".

Then came a second pro-Mubarak demo storming from Talaat Harb - throwing stones. And not the little kind, mind you, fist-sized stones. The first people are evacuated.

Selmeya, selmeya.."
Stones. Standoffs. We retreat. Regroup. Push forward again. Some people are panicking - rightfully. We are a mass of peaceful protestors and we're being attacked by a group of organized thugs. And it's really violent.

(Later)
I see kitchen knives. And swords. People are being attacked blindly. The back and forth, attack-withdraw-recollect-re

And - horses? Fucking horses? What is that? And the thugs riding them carry whips. Thank you, Mubarak.

5:00 - 6:00 pm.
Mayhem. Full-fledged stone throwing battle on Qasr-El-Nil bridge. The stones are ricocheting on the army tanks - I don't know where the soldiers are. Probably taking cover. Perhaps inside their tanks.
The battles are going insane. It's extremely messy in the square.
One of of the tanks was set on fire, but it was extinguished fairly rapidly. The other tank moved forward a little but then stopped.

7:00 pm
I am seeing a bunch of pro-Mubarak thugs throw Molotov cocktails at demonstrators. They broke into a shop, stood inside as they set their weapons, then would step outside and throw them.

Later (I stopped keeping track of time)
Mubarak thugs are armed to the teeth. Machetes, butcher knives. Molotov cocktails.

Fighting at its worse around the Egyptian Museum. I called a doctor who was there treating patients, and he had one word to describe the scene:

A carnage.

Midnight
Things have quieted down. Ambulances are allowed to go into Tahrir and reach patients - there are at least 1500 injured according to Reuters, and an unknown number of dead.

People are still out on the square though. I have left. The government is waging war on us, and the heroes in the square at this moment have won the battle.

I must sleep a little. God knows what tomorrow will bring. From my window I hear the noise of Tahrir square - I just heard Abdel Halim Hafez's "Khalli el sela7 sa7y". It's going to be a rough couple of days.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Revolution in Egypt, 25 January 2011, Day 1

I'll keep it short, and will write a narrative some other time.

In the meantime,

Whatever happens,

Never believe them if they say we lost.


[Media: given that I got several requests to use my photos: all are licensed under a CC license. Feel free to use and distribute, with attribution to Mohamed Al-Rahhal - http://www.travellerwithin.com. Also, if you could shoot me an email to tell me where you published them, I'd appreciate it.]

Full set of photos is HERE.
I'll keep posting on Twitter whenever possible, despite it being blocked...


I'll always remember this. Thousands crossing Asr El Nil bridge into downtown as soldiers let them through

Demonstrators calling on soldiers to join them


Demonstrator unconscious from tear gas, around 2 AM. We were peaceful. They were violent.

Soldier suffering from tear gas. I wish they'd understand that what hurts us, hurts them to.
Cardboard effigy of Mubarak hanging on a traffic light in Tahrir


More tear gas

Meet Kamel, the day's youngest demonstrator


Thumbs up!

The "light on the side of the demonstrators" effect wasn't deliberate - but I like it!

Nice cartoon. Khaled Said vs. Mubarak

No hereditary rule, no torture, no unemployment, no emergency law


Paramedics tent at the demonstration

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

I'm happy Clooney contracted Malaria


The only value of George Clooney dicking around in South Sudan this month is that he got malaria.

Now if only we get that much coverage whenever someone contracted a lethal-but-preventable-and-treatable disease, because

"Every year there are about 250 million cases of malaria and nearly a million deaths around the world, according to the World Health organization. In Africa, 20 percent of childhood deaths are due to effects of the disease."

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

The Government's skewed priorities: "supertram to connect Cairo to AUC"!



On the one hand, you've got several new satellite cities around Cairo, which were built as early as the 1980s to relieve demographic pressure from the capital: think 6th of October, which is one of the largest and is located to the North-West of the city; as well as Obour, Shorouk, Orabi, Badr, etc to the North-East.

Save a few pockets of wealth, inhabitants are generally middle class, who were lured by government promises of local development, easy transportation to the city, and who often bought their little plot of land directly from the government at preferential rates. There's now little money to be made for the government there.

Many - especially 6th of October city - are also home to industrial concentrations; I was recently told (but cannot confirm) that a third of the nation's industrial production came from the 6th of October city; an overstatement probably, but it gives an idea of its importance.

Public transportation in either directions is particularly weak, and traffic is a constant nightmare.

On the other hand, you have New Cairo, an immense swath of land slowly being built and inhabited. New Cairo is home, among other things, to the American University in Cairo, the German University in Cairo, as well as a number of gated communities of the Kattameya Heights and Hyde Park (photo) variety.
New Cairo's land has been sold to real-estate developers for peanuts - it was, after all, desert land - who made bazillions reselling the 'exclusivity' of the location.


Now if you're a government and have a limited amount of resources to build a line of tram to connect either. Which will you choose?

In a democratic state, priorities would have it that serving a large number of middle-income people would take precedence over servicing a less congested, less populated, and wealthier neighbourhood.

But Egypt is not a democracy: it is ruled by private interests and kleptocrats who combine economic with political power: case in point, after this month's rigged elections, 35 percent of the new parliament's seats belong to businessmen, including many real-estate developers.

So we get this:
"Egypt to launch Cairo-AUC supertram by 2015". Yes. Apparently, we're willing to put 5 Billion LE (900 million USD) to serve the wealthy residents of New Cairo and the private universities' students, whom either have their own cars or use the dedicated university bus service.


When faced with a serious problem such a transportation and traffic to Cairo's satellite cities, a respectable government would endeavour, invest, and work on it.

What our government did was to shut its eyes, look the other way - in fact, look at the glimmering shiny New Cairo, and decided that it would get it right this time, others be damned.

The policy is simple really - if it's too complicated to solve, ignore it.


By the same stroke, news of the tram will unavoidably raise the price of the land in New Cairo, land which belongs to either the state or its private realter friends.

I'm very much in favour of connecting all of Cairo by a solid transportation infrastructure. And a tram to AUC will surely serve many people. But the State's priority here is not to serve the largest number of people, but its own financial interests and those of the real-estate lobby; while ignoring the legitimate needs and demands of hundreds of thousands of less well-off voters.

Oh wait, they don't vote.



Sunday, December 26, 2010

Christmas Cairo Tweetup - Ze photos

Merry Christmas, happy new year, etc etc. You're here for the photos, so here they are. (yes, I know, the camera (or the photographer) is mediocre. Sorry about that.)

Cairo Tweeps, we'll see you next year!











Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Egyptian ambassador to Israel plants trees over destroyed Palestinian villages

I was flaring up in rage as I read today that
Egyptian ambassador to Israel Yasser Reda (see photo below) joined a host of foreign ambassadors to Tel Aviv in planting trees in the Carmel, after a wildfire that burned millions of trees and killed 43 people.
Now we sent assistance to extinguish the fire - quicker than we react to save Egyptians dying, but let's ignore that for now - as well as condolences for the lives lost. And that's saving human lives or trees, as well as nice and good neighbourly relations, etc: I'm all for that.


But replanting those trees I cannot comprehend. My stomach turns at the thought that the representative of my country is part of this immeasurable insult to justice and memory.

Insult, because those trees were planted by the state of Israel - to be precise, by the Jewish National Fund, (or KKL (read 'Kakal') from the Hebrew acronym) - atop the Palestinian villages wiped out by Jewish militias and terrorist groups before and during the 1948 war.

I first learned about those history-concealing trees reading Susan Nathan's very interesting book "The Other Side of Israel: My Journey Across the Jewish/Arab Divide".

But the unmissable read on that topic is Max Blumenthal's "The Carmel Wildfire is burning all illusions in Israel" - the section titled "Redeeming the Land" expands on the strategic positioning of those forests by the JNF to erase the traces of Palestinian history by planting pine forests. Read it if you haven't yet!
For that matter, the JNF has at times - and under serious legal pressure from Israeli organizations such as Zochrot - has acknowledged that, and submitted to putting a sign marking the name of the Palestinian communities decimated. See this excellent article on one such case.

Ambassador Yasser Reda, who has been in post since September 2008 is, despite sounding like a fairly intelligent speaker, proving to be an adept of shoving his foot in his mouth, collecting silly declarations and actions of that kind.

I am deeply ashamed. To the families of Palestinians whose memory my ambassador has helped wipe out today, I offer my apologies and beg for your forgiveness.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010

بيقولك كان فيه واحد بتاع مخابرات عايزنا نعمل انقلاب


طلعلنا في البخت واحد يدعي أن اسمه أيمن سالم - و أنه عايزنا، باختصار، نطلع يوم الجمعة القادم نقلب الريس و نقوله، على حد اقتراح أخونا أيمن، "شكرا أنت طلعت معاش".
و الجميل كمان انه عامل لنا فيسبوك افنت. عشان كل واحد يعزم أصحابه عالبارتي بتاع الانقلاب!

طبعا الموضوع لطيف و دمه خفيف و كل اسبوع واحد بيطلعلنا بمدونة تقترح نفس الكلام. انما نادرا ما صاحب الاقتراح بيكون (أو بيدعي، على وجه التحديد) انه ضابط مخابرات، و يحطلنا رقمه القومي و عنوان بيتهم.

صاحبنا أيمن عمل موقع لطيف حاطط لنا عليه الرسالة، و صفحة فيسبوك عليها نفس الكلام عشان لو كنت خايف لسبب ما تفتح الموقع لا يكون عليه فيروس زي ما حد كان أفتى (بالرغم أن الموقع مش باين فيه مشاكل عندي)..
** قبل ما انشر التدوينة على طول كان الموقع واقع، بس صفحة الفيسبوك موجودة**

السؤال طبعا مش لو اننا هنروح نبلغ الريس انه طلع معاش (ههههههه) بس لو الأخ ده بجد. و ده في الغالب غير متوقع. بس أهو تسلية و السلام و الدنيا برد كدة و زهق!

طبعا انا مارحتلوش البيت و لا كشفت على رقم البطاقة، بس الموقع بتاعة من مفيش اسبوع كان موقع هابط عن مصر الفرعونية: اضغط على الصورة عشان تشوف الموقع القديم (from Google cache).


و لسبب غير واضح الراجل كان راشئ جوجل ماب لخريطة بيتهم كمان.
ليه الموقع تحول من الكلام عن الفراعنة القدام الى فرعون القرن الحادي و العشرين ؟ غير مفهوم.

الطريف كمان أن الموقع نفسه اتسجل من شهرين - يوم 7 اكتوبر اللي فات. و يبدو انه سجله عن طريق شركة استرالية بتقدم خدمة التسجيل من غير اظهار تفاصيل صاحب الموقع: العنوان المحطوط عنوان مضروب في كاليفورنيا، و عنوان الايميل بتاع الشركة. بيانات التسجيل أهي:

Domain Name aymansalem.com

Creation Date 2010-10-07

Registration Date 2010-10-07

Expiry Date 2011-10-07

Organisation Name aymansalem

Organisation Address PO Box 61359

Sunnyvale 94088 CA US

Admin Name Admin PrivateRegContact

Admin Address PO Box 61359

registered post accepted only

Sunnyvale 94088

CA US

Admin Email [email protected]

Admin Phone +1.5105952002


باختصار عشان ماطولش عليكم، الموضوع كله على الأغلب مجرد دعابة سخيفة مش حتى مؤامرة تعبانة... بس انا حقيقة على قدر من الفضول اني أعرف مين الخفيف ده.

ماحدش عايز ييجي معايا نزوره في بيته؟ :)

Sunday, November 28, 2010

في مصر... ماحدش فوق القانون




أخذت الفكرة من ستيكر على سيارة في الولايات المتحدة. و لو اني أعتقد أن الكلام اللي بالخط الصغير كان أقل شوية من كدة...

انا عايز أطبع ده على ستيكرات للسيارات. و على تي-شيرتات كمان :) ليه لأ؟


كل انتخابات و انتم طيبين!

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Facebook responds to my inquiry on the removal of two Egyptian pro-democracy pages



I contacted Facebook's press office, requesting answers for the removal of two anti-government pages during the course of Thursday.

One of the pages I'm talking is that of Khaled Said, a young man assassinated by the Egyptian police last June and whose murder raised one of the biggest protest movement in the past couple of decades.
The other one is a support group for Mohamed El Baradei, former IAEA director, Nobel laureate, and popular opposition figure.

This came a day before "Anger Friday" - what has been dubbed as the first political flashmob in Cairo, and three days before parliamentary elections expected to be another electoral sham.
Of course, everyone - myself included - assumed it was done under government pressure.

The pages were reinstated by the end of the day, but this remains a particularly worrying event and an example of Facebook showing what seemed like either a strange political bias - and it wouldn't be the first time pages have been removed for political reasons - or a responsiveness to government pressure. Either case is highly disturbing.


So I contacted Facebook requesting an interview with their Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA) director, and included a few questions on why the pages were removed, whether they had received a request from the government, and how they dealt with such requests normally.

I got a response from their EMEA director of communication, which is fine by me.

This is what he had to say:



Now given that I hadn't spoken about reports, it felt like a cop-out on their part. So I responded with a couple of very straightforward questions, on whether they had been asked to remove them by the government, and what was their standard policy when they received such requests from governments. This was the follow-up response:


Make what you will of it. Personally, I'm not really buying that it was a freak coincidence that those two pages had script or admin issues - three days before the election.

What do YOU think?

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

كل ستة أكتوبر و انتم طيبين: لو لم أكن مصريا...

بمناسبة الذكرى ال37 للضربة الجوية المباركة، صورتين كنت محتفظ بيهم من زمان و مش لاقيلهم المناسبة المناسبة...




----- صديق على فيسبوك. يعمل في وظيفة مرموقة في الدولة المصرية -----





----- على حائط في شارع القصر العيني، صورة التقطتها من حوالي سنتين -----


نهاركم زي الفل ان شاء الله!

Sunday, October 03, 2010

The Traveller Within is FIVE!



That many!


FIVE YEARS.

Hey, my blog is old enough to go to kindergarten now!

Jeez, if I was paid a dime per word I wrote, I’d be rich.

Starting with an incredibly dull first post on a boring Boston evening and a title that must've made sense to me back then (but right now I have no idea what I actually meant by 'the Traveller Within' - something about introspection or other), I am grateful I got to share my mostly nonsensical reflections with an often-too-kind readership. The blog - and subsequently the Facebook profile, Twitter account and Flickr album that ensued - sometimes seem to have overtaken my 'official' identity... but I’m not complaining. I’m enjoying the ride tremendously.


Besides, this blog landed me a writing job and a girlfriend. So, really...


Somehow I’ve had some unexpected readers and people who landed from all sorts of weird search queries. But through it all I am deeply grateful to all my regular readers and commentators: you make it all worthwhile. Thank you for tuning it regularly!


if anyone can suggest why the US army reads my blog, I'd be grateful!


I’ve written about many trips, a lot of politics, less economics than I'd have liked to - the blog has always lacked an overarching theme but I enjoy it too much to let go of the right to kvetch about anything that comes to mind...


I've launched the #CairoTweetup meetings here, and made innumerable friends online and offline.


I’ve also started a few series of articles - including “The Arab review of Israeli cinema/tv”, as well as the “Occupation 101” and “Israel 101” from my time in Palestine. (links are on the left sidebar). Those have infuriated a bunch of people - but I always believed that if you manage to piss off everyone, then you’re probably doing someone right!


I guess a short selection of my 'blog hits' is in order - and if you're a new reader, start with those (though I warn you, the rest of the blog is probably shit in comparison). So with no further ado and in no particular order...


Male Orders Hymen


Egypt-Israel gas deal: WHO is behind it? The names, the relationships, the clientelism...


Private photos of El Baradei’s family spark controversy online

(which somehow is the first Google hit when you search for “Baradei family photos”)


To You, the new Iran 'expert'


The Israeli army raid on my street ruined my shawarma


Egypt's TWO middle classes


Name: Ossama. Occupation: Soldier in the Israeli Army


So, yeah. Five!

Friday, October 01, 2010

Greek Club Cairo Tweetup: the Photos!




Friends -
Below are the photos of the Legen-fucking-dary Tweetup at the Greek Club last week - which, by Zeus, was well worth the wait. Fantastic crowd and great location, what more can a Tweep ask for?

The Flickr set is here; and the more Facebook-inclined, the Facebook album is here. Tag, tag away! (and connect with me, of course!)

A sneak preview:




Apparently, we were running out of chairs :)

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Κάιρο τσιτσιρίζω! (That's Greek for "Cairo Tweetup!")



Hello, Cairo, we missed you too! Hopefully the next Tweetup will have been worth the wait!

When: Sunday 26 September. 7:30 PM.

Where: Greek Club, 21 Mohamed Bassiouni , Talaat Harb Square. That's right above Groppi - take the building's main stairs one floor up. We'll be on the terrace.

02-25750759. Ramy Adel is the nice manager who agreed to waive the minimum charge for us.


Suggested topics of conversation:
Your favourite Mubz photoshopped photo [extra points for bringing it with you!]. This week's demos. Laila ElBaradei's adorable wedding photos and the pathetic fucks who leaked them. Who gained weight during Ramadan.

Forbidden topic of conversation: Ramadan TV shows.


The 'Right to Climb' responds - message from Mr. Omar Samra

Omar Samra, owner of the company that managed the "Right To Climb" expedition to Kilimanjaro which I criticised here, left the following comment. Due to blogspot's infuriating comment system, his message came out truncated and its paragraphs a little garbled, sections of his response came to me but weren't published somehow, etc. (knowing that I do not moderate comments).

For this, and as I had promised, I'm re-posting it here as a standalone post - and I thank him for taking the time to respond. Out of respect and as this is not, after all, an inimical conversation - I harbour no ill-will to Mr. Samra whom I don't personally know - I tried to keep my comments to a bare minimum (nearly succeeded, too!) to correct or clarify facts, not going into a perspectives shouting match, tempted as I was to argue on many occasions. But my perspective was already made clear in the previous post so no point in repeating it. While many of Mr. Samra's comments are indeed clarifying, most of my criticism remains, I believe, appropriate. But that's up to you to judge.

I also have no intention to post a further response to this letter, but will respond to potential reader comments if any.
Thanks.
mt


-------- Mr. Samra's message --------------------------

Hello Mohamed,

My name is Omar Samra, the person I believe whose integrity is in question here . I tried to get your number off a common friend to explain the facts given that you are willing to be proven wrong. You were not willing to speak to me.

Indeed - a written debate needs not be made into a voice one. But I did promise said common friend that should you wish to respond by email I'd publish your message in its entirety, as I am doing here.

And so am reverting to this blog comment to clarify a few points. I hope everyone who read the first blog post reads it. Anyway, here goes:

First of all I write this response under the assumption that Mr. Mohamed (blog author) wrote this not in malice but because he cares about the cause of special needs in Egypt and felt bad that some wrongdoing was being made. Otherwise there would be no point in going on.

Yep.

I maintain that The Right To Climb (RTC) initiative was done first and foremost to raise funds and awareness for the charity. As a company we run regular trips to Kilimanjaro and it is infinitely easier to organize those than an entire charity campaign as well alongside. It is true that the RTC did receive a lot of PR as intended and this is as it should be because it is a novel approach to charity and a success on all counts. Let me explain all addressed points as much as I can. Please ask questions if you feel I have missed anything

My motivations are clear and have always been transparent:
1) Both my sisters are mentally challenged and securing funds for the organization indirectly secures their future
2) I care deeply about the cause and have regularly volunteered in the field since 1988
3) I sit on the board of the NGO (public info on the RTLA's website) since this year and the RTC is a way of contributing positively through my work (Wild Guanabana). Namely raising funds and awareness for the great work that is being done by the RTLA.

The climb costs $2650 not $5000 as mentioned in the blog.

Short of seeing the invoices, I obviously have no tangible way of proving otherwise. This said, the rough figure of $5000 was obtained by asking the friends/families of not one but two of the climbers on your trip, as well as a third party who's a seasoned climber. Therefore I fully stand by my figures.

The assumption that the RTLA would have been better off without the climb is flawed to the core. If we had reached out to those same people to donate $3600 each they would not have just handed over the cash. Most probably they have other ideas of how they want to use their money or other charities to give to. After all, philanthropy is a competitive field. What we did is give them the opportunity to embark on a unique journey they have always wanted to do, climbing Kilimanjaro, and use this as a vehicle to raise money and awareness for the cause, which they did successfully. With the idea presented in this way many were willing to do both things together. Also, this approach in terms of awareness is much more powerful than if they had simply donated money (assuming this was even possible in this magnitude) because then only those people would know about the RTLA and the great work they are doing as well as the cause itself. By getting over 20 people to prepare for one of the biggest challenges of their lives for 3 months they inevitably get to speak to tens if not hundreds of people and they spread the word this way. For them to raise money they need to be armed with answers about the cause and RTLA (most people don’t just hand over donations lightly) which means they do not become only donors but hopefully ambassadors which I am sure most will agree is infinitely more powerful especially in the medium and long term.

The figure of $51,990 you mentioned was not an up-to-date figure and it is wrong to measure the success of the initiative based on results that are not final.

That was the figure on your website the final day of your Kilimanjaro expedition - and the day of publication of the post.

Moreover, please bare in mind that there is no big corporation behind the RTC or Wild Guanabana for that matter. It is simply a handful of individuals including myself who were working round the clock those last 3 months to make this happen. So yes we did not update figures as efficiently as we wanted but we are working on this and everyone can rest assured that the full and accurate figures will be published at the end. We have updated the website recently and so far we have raised $121,000. We still hope there is more to come through. Whether the final figure lives up to Mohamed's expectations of success is a different story (in reference to the model UN pun) but we are trying our best and trust me these numbers are significant for the RTLA. Please bare in mind that LE20K is the cost of one kid there for one year so a rough calculation suggests we have funded the costs of 34 kids for a whole year, which is something. We hope to do more. You also make a remark that we could have done better. Assuming that you or someone else would have done a better job at this, is this really a case for such tone in your blog?

(Huh?)

Remember that big budgets and TV ad campaigns allow more mainstream charities to get the lion's share of funding from corporations and individuals so every person we convinced to donate something no matter how miniscule is a success. Sponsors that came on board to provide financial or in kind support were to a large extent driven by the originality of the initiative. Also consider that this is the first time we do this initiative, not everything we tried worked, we learn from our mistakes and will do better next time.

As you can see from the above, Omar Samra (me) is not the ONLY winner as you say. My company Wild Guanabana did gain exposure from this initiative but there is no shame in this and it would be hard to run and initiative like this and not gain exposure for the organizing company. The Right To Climb name was promoted aggressively because it is the charity initiative, so was the RTLA’s. The people at the RTLA themselves will tell you how much exposure this generated for them whether through phone enquiries, donations (some people after hearing about the RTC decided to donate to the NGO outside of our initiative and this we don’t count in our fundraising) and website hits. As a company we did get 26 out of 26 people to the top and this is a great achievement on a world scale. The expeditions unblemished success reflected positively on the whole charity initiative and allowed us to raise more awareness. An expedition where people get sick, hospitalized or a large percentage not make it to the summit fills people with less confidence about the entire endeavor. Moreover, as a company that is only over a year old we managed to create a successful CSR campaign that was wide reaching and helped the RTLA and shed light on a much neglected cause. How many young companies in Egypt do you see doing the same? You can also speak to the Special Olympics if you would like to assess the effectiveness of the campaign compared to other initiatives they see through their line of work. An awareness seminar we organized at Sawi Cultural Wheel alone attended by over 400 people made a big difference. In it we spoke about the cause, the issues faced and had one of the RTLA’s graduates talk about her success story with the organization.

When the idea of the RTC came about it was to take 1 down syndrome kid to the top with us to show their talents and prove that they are amazing individuals capable of so much more than most people think (hence the name The Right To Climb). As you can see on our website, the Special Olympics are our patrons and we went to them to pick the most appropriate special Olympian for this. After thorough consultation physicians advised us that this would be extremely dangerous because they typically have weak hearts (and at 5,500m your heart can beat at 120BPM at rest) and suffer from epilepsy, which might be aggravated by altitude. From here we decided that the risk is too high to do such a thing but we kept the name as it is symbolic

Your intentions I am in now way to guess. But I find keeping the name despite its actual irrelevance {as you explained yourself} is eyebrow-raising to say the least.

and still holds true that everyone does have a right to climb, climbing is also a metaphor for any challenging endeavor including some of the misunderstanding and stereotype these people have to go through throughout their lives. Having said this, if not for the remoteness of the location and ednon proximity to proper medical care and altitude hostility, I am sure that they would have made it despite its difficulty because most of these athletes are more fit than most of us even. So when we could not do this we organized a bowling evening where we all took the kids from the RTLA out so that everyone can meet them and for the climbers to know who are the people they are helping with this initiative. All the climbers now know many of the kids by name and have made lasting friendships.
We have plans to also go on a simple hike in wadi degla with the kids and hopefully maintain contact going forward.

Lovely sentiment. But whether the 'friendships' are 'lasting' or not, is complete speculation.

About creating awareness and using the right channels and saying that Nile FM doesn’t talk to the masses. As far as I know twitter does not reach the 80 million of Egypt Mohamed but you use it nonetheless. Does that make your message any less important? Or dishonest as you called ours?

I didn't call the message 'dishonest'. I called the claim that trekking in Tanzania will raise awareness about mental disabilities within the Egyptian society, dishonest.
And why I use Twitter is utterly irrelevant to this conversation, don't you think?

Sure there are more people out there but we do what we can and so should everyone. Going on TV, mass newspapers and reaching the 80m costs money we do not have so we start small and hope to get bigger one day. If every company in Egypt did their part in CSR no matter how small this would definitely be a step in the right direction.

It may be true that some of the people on the trip did not have a primary objective of charity on this trip, at least to begin with, but there is nothing wrong with that.

I actually found it laudable.


Did they not get off their sofas and raise money from friends and family? Did they not talk about what they are doing for weeks and months to everyone they came across? Surely you cannot discredit people’s efforts no matter how small they are. Moreover, if it started this way I can tell you confidently that after interacting with the kids at the RTLA and living this journey together for the last 3 months, every single one of the climbers are passionate about the cause, can talk intelligently about it and will forever be ambassadors for it. In their lifetime they will hopefully inspire many other people to do good in any way they can.


Your 2.4:1 point is completely wrong. The trip costs much less and raised much more than you said (figures above). This again is an irrelevant calculation because once again you cannot count money people are willing to pay for a trip as money that could have gone to the charity. What we’ve done is effectively include people into this effort that would have otherwise not participated. I am sorry if you are only familiar with marathons as challenges to raise money for charity.

That was merely the example I used.


You might want to search Kilimanjaro and charity and see how many times this model been used to great success around the world and yes these trips cost money. I can also site many other successful initiatives to raise charity money that are way more costly than a climb to Kilimanjaro. There are many highly respected for profit companies out there who do charity challenges as their core business. They make money off organizing the events but through the work they do raise thousands of dollars for good causes.
If good intentions are only useful as long as they translate into something tangible (according to you) then we have definitely achieved something we can all be proud of. We are in the process of gathering the last pieces of donations and will announce our results shortly. However, for the benefit of everyone out there in the world who tries to do good but is not successful, please keep trying and not let anyone put you down.

Thank you for your attention.

Omar

Friday, September 17, 2010

The Right to Climb on the Back of Children with Mental Disability [w/ addendum]

Some 25 people went to climb Mount Kilimanjaro, reaching the top earlier today.
Bravo: awesome athletic feat. Congratulations.

But for the organizers to pretend that they're doing it for charity is shameless, and rather despicable, self-aggrandizement.

"Climbing Kilimanjaro for Special Needs", the travel company officially titled the expedition.

How do you say bullshit in Swahili?

Consider this:
- Each climber paid for their own trip; while supposedly attempted to fund-raise 20,000 EGP ($3600) each.
Good.

But the climb cost about $5000 per climber [according to friends/siblings of climbers on this expedition] - which means that, had they donated the climbing money to the organization - the Right to Live - the organization would've gotten more money out of it.

How much did they raise so far? $51,990, from the expedition's own webpage. If there were 11 climbers, their climbing money would've been greater than that. (remember, there were 25 - so a total expense of $125,000).

Yep. Do the math.

As a friend rightly says, "احا، كانوا دفعوهم للمنظمة و راحوا يتسلقوا الهرم"...


And they claim they got corporate sponsorship. Seriously, your fundraising people are... Well the kids who did fundraising for our model UN in college consistently did a better job, for fuck's sake.

With the amount of coverage they got - and with a famous radio host on board - they could've done infinitely better.


The big winner? The leader of the expedition, one Omar Samra, "the first Egyptian to climb Mount Everest" says the FB page; who, not surprisingly, owns the travel company that organized the expedition.

[Do you hear what I hear? param pam pishhh....:]


I'm very much willing to be proven wrong - when I see the financials of this trip. Expenses, income, donations, how much money the company made, corporate sponsorship receipts, etc.

Until then, I'll consider this expedition as a shameful attempt to make a few dollars off the backs of children with mental disabilities.

Whom, as someone pointed out, were not included in the trip; as far as I know, there are no people with mental disabilities on the climb, are there?

The other claim is, huh 'creating awareness'? Oh peu-lease. Climbing Mount Kilimanjaro to raise awareness in a country where a majority of the population depends on food subsidies is completely outlandish, irrelevant to most, and simply dishonest. And has an unmistakable Marie-Antoinette-ish ("They want bread? Let them eat cake!") feel to it.
Most of the Egyptian public doesn't listen to NileFM, son.


I will give them a little credit for not towing the bullshit line all the way: after all, and to quote Mr. Samra,
the goal is to allow people to discover more about themselves and the world
while benefiting the society that we live in.”

See the first half of the quote, that works for me. It's an amazing trip indeed and I truly hope the participants had the adventure of a lifetime - a truly perspective-altering experience that will leave them better men and women.

Indeed, I know for a fact that some of the participants went on this expedition for the pleasure and challenge of the climb, with no claims or pretense of saving the world.

Let me reiterate: I have no problems with going on a good adventure, quite on the contrary: I'd love to climb Kili one day. [Definitely not with that company though!]

But I do have a problem when some people - namely, the organizers - piggyback on an important cause for their advertisement purposes. That is disgusting.


Oh, and let's not play the 'I have relatives with mental disabilities so you can't doubt my sincerity' game:

a. I fully respect that, and sympathize with the families of mentally disabled children. I also have close relatives with mental disabilities and I know how difficult it is sometimes, particularly for the parents and siblings.

b.
It's completely irrelevant. Good intentions are only useful insofar as they translate into something tangible.

The 'Right to Climb' expedition has not.



To sum up:


- This was either a charitable venture: in which case, it's a failure. When for every $1 raised for charity, $2.4 were spent on the trip (that's 125K/51.99K), then it was better off donating the participation expenses w khalas.
Charity sports events are by definition cheap - such as a race or a half-marathon, for instance, like that one which a friend ran recently. This way, sunk costs are very low; nearly all the money involved goes to the charitable organization of choice.
Having a 'charitable event' which needs to carry participants 4000 kilometres to climb a mountain just to raise money - if that is indeed the claim - is ludicrous.

- This is not a charitable venture but a trip, the climbers were going anyway, and they took the opportunity to raise some money 3al ganb: very well. Then the trip should NOT have been marketed as "Climbing Kilimanjaro for Special Needs" because obviously it isn't. You do NOT call it "The Right to Climb" because the trip wasn't advocating for disabled kids' right to climb anything, given that they were nowhere near the climb. And you do NOT pretend you're going to save the world because that's pure hypocrisy, and a shameful, shameful PR stunt.